Growth in the use of interoperable EHR records by Canadian doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals is fueling benefits for patients and providers, including improved quality of patient care, according to two articles published this year in the peer-reviewed journal BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. “The evidence confirms that use of the interoperable EHR systems built by the provinces, territories, and their many partners over the past 15 years is delivering patient care benefits and improvements for providers as intended,” said Michael Green (pictured), president and CEO, Canada Health Infoway.
According to the article Measuring interoperable EHR adoption and maturity: a Canadian example, 91,235 healthcare providers inCanada were active users of at least two interoperable EHR (iEHR) components (e.g., access to diagnostic images and drug information outside of their organization) as of March 31, 2015.
Twelve months later, that figure jumped by an additional 50 per cent, bringing the number to approximately 139,000. More than 250,000 clinicians from across Canada use at least one component of the iEHR.
A second article, The value of connected health information: perceptions of electronic health users in Canada, reveals that iEHR users are reporting improved quality of care and improved access to patient information.
“The use of the iEHR by Canadian clinicians is beyond the tipping point, and following closely behind are patients and caregivers, who also expect to have the ability to make use of digital health tools and capabilities, as they should,” added Green.
The value of connected health information: perceptions of electronic health users in Canada is based on evidence from studies conducted by Canada Health Infoway. A total of 2,316 iEHR users across six jurisdictions in Canada responded to surveys between 2006 and 2014 about system, information, and service quality; iEHR use and satisfaction; and net quality and productivity benefits. Measuring interoperable EHR adoption and maturity: a Canadian example is based on technology adoption trends over time, and is supported by data from surveys of clinicians and patients, usage data from digital health solutions, and operational data sets collected by our partners.