Performance & Quality
ED wait times on the rise across Canada
July 8, 2026
TORONTO – One in 10 patients spent more than 14 hours waiting for care in Canadian emergency departments, and those requiring admission to hospital sometimes waited more than three times longer, according to new research covering parts of 2024 and 2025.
The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), in a report released late last month, underscored that emergency department overcrowding is a result of pressures across the country’s healthcare system, both from inside and outside the hospital setting.
This includes limited access to primary and long-term care, hospital bed shortages and an increasingly complex patient population, the Globe and Mail reported.
The report concluded that 1.5 million patients in 2024-25, or 10 percent, waited more than 14 hours in the ED, based on data from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS). This represents a 28-per-cent increase from 2018-19.
About 12 percent of emergency department visits from April 2024, to March 2025, resulted in admission to hospital.
Of those patients, one in 10 spent more than two days in the emergency department regardless of how serious their condition was – a 33-percent jump from 2018-19. CIHI said this was driven by higher admission rates among older, more medically complex patients.
Dr. Michael Herman (pictured), an Ottawa-based emergency physician, said the CIHI data reflect the experiences of front-line doctors who have felt pressure build inside EDs for years.
“What it’s showing us is that we have a sicker population, more people are coming to us, they have less access to supports in the community and they’re staying in our emergency departments longer,” said Dr. Herman.
Doctors across the country have long been sounding the alarm about overcrowding in emergency departments, an issue compounded by hospital underfunding and staffing shortages. In the summer months, the problem grows worse, with temporary emergency department closings in rural areas expected as health workers take much-needed time off.
Earlier this year, in Alberta, physicians and the provincial New Democratic Party called on the government to declare a formal emergency over ED overcrowding after the much-publicized death of Prashant Sreekumar. Mr. Sreekumar, 44, died after an apparent cardiac arrest after spending eight hours in an Edmonton emergency department.
The CIHI report shows 0.1 percent of patients died and 7.7 percent of patients left EDs before seeing a physician in 2024-25. Roughly 16.1 million ED visits were reported to NACRS that fiscal year, representing about 89 percent of all visits across Canada.
Two-thirds of the ED visits were triaged as high-acuity, which indicates a life-threatening condition or the need for rapid medical evaluation. Children under 10, adults over 55 and Canadians living in low-income neighbourhoods visited most often.
The report also showed that large urban and teaching hospitals saw higher volumes of emergency department visits and complex patients.
One “horrifying” finding in the report – a term Dr. Herman said he doesn’t use lightly – is that older patients are waiting longer than younger ones to be placed in an inpatient bed. Older patients often have comorbidities or isolation requirements and must wait for an appropriate bed or specialized unit, according to the report.
People over 75 have an increased risk of mortality if they spend even one night in an ED, said Dr. Herman before also pointing to a study out of the United Kingdom. Its findings, published in 2022, concluded that for every 82 patients kept waiting in the ED for six to eight hours for an inpatient bed, there is one additional death.
“This isn’t just an inconvenience, this is lethal,” said Dr. Herman.
He said there has been ample time for Canada to prepare for the impacts of an aging population but not enough has been done, especially to boost primary, long-term and community care supports.
“Unfortunately, when those roads are blocked, the only road that people have is to come to the emergency department.”
The data show that patients admitted to inpatient care through an emergency department were discharged within a median of four days. However, eight percent were designated alternative level of care (ALC) patients. These are people who no longer require hospital care but still occupy a bed until they can be transferred to a more appropriate setting.
ALC patients had a median stay of 24 days in hospital, which reduces bed availability for patients requiring admission from the ED.
Cheryl Chui, CIHI’s director of health system analytics, said the report underlines that improving emergency department wait times will require solutions that address the health system as a whole.
“If you just focus on ED wait times, then that tends to be where people sort of target the solution. But what we’re trying to illustrate with this report is that, actually, everything is interconnected.”
The CIHI report appropriately emphasizes that emergency department overcrowding is a health system issue rather than an isolated ED problem, yet focuses only on throughput.
However, the persistent challenge is that, despite years of data demonstrating worsening ED wait times, the discussion has often remained focused on repeatedly measuring the problem rather than identifying and addressing the underlying root causes.
ED wait times are primarily a process indicator; they tell us where pressure is occurring but do not, by themselves, explain why the system is failing or whether patient outcomes are improving. The critical question is not only how long patients wait, but why they arrive, why they cannot access alternative pathways, why flow is disrupted, and where accountability exists across the continuum of care.
CIHI’s insights into ED throughput and evidence-informed strategies appropriately address internal flow challenges once patients arrive:
Arrival → triage → assessment → treatment → disposition → admission/discharge
However, throughput is not the same as demand management. A comprehensive solution must address the full patient journey:
Population health needs → care-seeking behaviour → appropriate access pathways → primary/community care capacity → ED arrival → throughput → disposition → transitions of care
The current challenge is that these components often remain disconnected, managed through separate structures, incentives, and accountability frameworks. If the system were truly integrated, many of the recurring problems highlighted in CIHI reports would have been recognized earlier through a whole-system lens rather than primarily through ED performance metrics.
Sustainable improvement requires moving beyond measuring congestion at the endpoint and developing integrated, outcome-based strategies that connect population health planning, primary care access, community supports, hospital capacity, and patient flow. ED overcrowding is the visible symptom; the underlying issue is a fragmented care system lacking coordinated accountability throughout the entire patient journey.